Secure your Snyk surface
Dependency and container findings prioritised by reachability, not by CVSS alone. We don’t connect to Snyk to collect evidence for its own sake — we connect to secure it, and the compliance artefacts follow from that work.
Book a Demo[01] What This Surface Exposes
Where Snyk goes wrong
Snyk goes wrong through drift in coverage: projects imported once, then repositories added later that nobody connected.
- Projects imported once and never re-scanned as the code moved on
- High-severity findings ignored via policy without a recorded decision
- License and dependency risk untracked alongside vulnerability risk
- Container base image findings separated from the application findings that share the image
- Integrations disconnected after a token expiry, silently ending coverage
[02] What We Secure
What we watch, catch and fix on Snyk
On Snyk we reconcile scan coverage against your actual repository list and triage findings by whether the vulnerable code is reachable.
- Scan coverage reconciled against your actual repository list, so an unimported project is a visible gap
- Findings triaged by whether the vulnerable function is reachable, because most dependency CVEs are not exploitable in context
- Ignore policies reviewed with their justification and expiry
- Base image and application findings correlated to avoid duplicated effort
- Integration health monitored so coverage loss is caught immediately
[03] Where It Lands
Where Snyk lands in your registers
Repositories and pipelines become asset register entries with their own criticality, because a build system that can deploy to production is a production system. Access reviews cover repository and pipeline permissions alongside your other entitlements, and the risk register carries supply chain exposure — the dependencies you pull, the actions you run, and who can push without review.
[04] How We Engage
On Snyk specifically
On Snyk, we triage findings, drive upgrades through your pipeline, and maintain ignore hygiene with real justifications. Framework and runtime major-version upgrades we scope and project-manage.
Platform licence
Everything you need to find and fix it yourself, with no ceiling on the depth of the answer.
- Every connected tool monitored for misconfiguration and drift, with findings mapped to the assets and risks they affect
- Remediation guidance that tells you what is wrong and exactly how to fix it — however deep or awkward the issue is. We are engineers running a security company, so the answer is the real one, not a link to vendor documentation
- Assets, access reviews, and risk register populated from the tools themselves rather than from spreadsheets
- Unlimited integrations and unlimited users, with anything missing built within two weeks
Managed service
Every tool you connect through Konfirmity comes under our care, with our team doing the work.
- Continuous misconfiguration and drift monitoring across every connected tool, watched by our analysts rather than by a dashboard waiting for you
- Incident response led by us, with containment coordinated with your team
- Remediation performed directly wherever you have granted us the authority to act — and where we cannot act, we project-manage the fix to completion rather than handing you a ticket
- Decision support on the tools themselves: where something is failing you on capability or costing more than it returns, we will tell you, and help you replace it
[05] Snyk FAQs
What Snyk access does Konfirmity need?
Konfirmity needs a service account token with read access to organisations, projects and issues. That covers coverage reconciliation, finding triage and ignore-policy review. We do not need the ability to modify projects or dismiss issues.
Why prioritise by reachability rather than CVSS?
Because most dependency vulnerabilities are not exploitable in a given application — the vulnerable function is never called. Ranking purely by CVSS produces a backlog engineers learn to ignore. Reachability tells you which findings genuinely warrant an upgrade now.