Secure your Deel surface
Contractor and international worker lifecycle — the population most often missed in access reviews. We don’t connect to Deel to collect evidence for its own sake — we connect to secure it, and the compliance artefacts follow from that work.
Book a Demo[01] What This Surface Exposes
Where Deel goes wrong
Deel goes wrong at the contract boundary: contractors onboarded to systems without appearing in the main worker record.
- Contractors onboarded to systems without appearing in your main worker record
- Contract end dates passing without access revocation
- Identity and compliance documents retained without limits
- Admin access spanning entities and jurisdictions unnecessarily
- API tokens with broad organisation scope
[02] What We Secure
What we watch, catch and fix on Deel
On Deel we reconcile the contractor population against system access, since contractors are the group access reviews most often overlook.
- Contractor population reconciled against system access, since contractors are the group access reviews most often overlook
- Contract end date to revocation latency measured
- Document retention aligned to policy and local requirements
- Admin scope reviewed per entity
- Token scope tracked
[03] Where It Lands
Where Deel lands in your registers
HR data is what makes access review meaningful: every entitlement across every connected system is reconciled against the people who actually work here, so a leaver with live access is a finding within hours rather than at the next quarterly review. The asset register records the HR platform as a critical dependency holding significant personal data, and the risk register carries both the insider risk and the data protection exposure that comes with it.
[04] How We Engage
On Deel specifically
On Deel, we reconcile contractor access against contract status and drive revocation. Multi-entity access model design we plan with your operations team.
Platform licence
Everything you need to find and fix it yourself, with no ceiling on the depth of the answer.
- Every connected tool monitored for misconfiguration and drift, with findings mapped to the assets and risks they affect
- Remediation guidance that tells you what is wrong and exactly how to fix it — however deep or awkward the issue is. We are engineers running a security company, so the answer is the real one, not a link to vendor documentation
- Assets, access reviews, and risk register populated from the tools themselves rather than from spreadsheets
- Unlimited integrations and unlimited users, with anything missing built within two weeks
Managed service
Every tool you connect through Konfirmity comes under our care, with our team doing the work.
- Continuous misconfiguration and drift monitoring across every connected tool, watched by our analysts rather than by a dashboard waiting for you
- Incident response led by us, with containment coordinated with your team
- Remediation performed directly wherever you have granted us the authority to act — and where we cannot act, we project-manage the fix to completion rather than handing you a ticket
- Decision support on the tools themselves: where something is failing you on capability or costing more than it returns, we will tell you, and help you replace it
[05] Deel FAQs
What Deel access does Konfirmity need?
Konfirmity needs an API token with read access to contracts and people, scoped to engagement status and dates. Identity documents and payment details are outside what we request.
Why do contractors need separate attention?
Because they are usually managed outside the HRIS that drives your access reviews. A contract ending rarely triggers the offboarding workflow an employee departure does, so contractor access routinely outlives the engagement it was granted for.
Workday
Gusto
Personio
HiBob
BambooHR