Secure your Jira surface
Project permission sprawl, anonymous access, and credentials pasted into tickets and attachments. We don’t connect to Jira to collect evidence for its own sake — we connect to secure it, and the compliance artefacts follow from that work.
Book a Demo[01] What This Surface Exposes
Where Jira goes wrong
Jira goes wrong through permission schemes and paste habits: schemes shared across projects, and credentials pasted into tickets.
- Projects with anonymous or all-logged-in-users browse permissions on internet-reachable instances
- Credentials, connection strings, and customer data pasted into ticket descriptions and attachments
- Permission schemes shared across projects so a change to one silently alters others
- Marketplace apps with broad scopes reading every issue in the instance
- External collaborators and customer-portal accounts retaining access after engagements end
[02] What We Secure
What we watch, catch and fix on Jira
On Jira we map permission scheme sharing, because scheme reuse is how a change to a low-sensitivity project opens a high-sensitivity one.
- Browse permission audited per project, since anonymous access on a public instance exposes your entire backlog including security tickets
- Credential and personal data detection across issue content and attachments, followed by rotation of what was exposed
- Permission scheme sharing mapped, because scheme reuse is how a low-sensitivity change opens a high-sensitivity project
- Marketplace app scope reviewed against what each app genuinely needs
- External account lifecycle reconciled against your vendor and HR records
[03] Where It Lands
Where Jira lands in your registers
Trackers become asset register entries in their own right, because a ticket system holding incident detail, credentials, and customer data is a sensitive system. Access reviews cover project permissions and external collaborators. The risk register draws its remediation status directly from ticket state, so an overdue finding is visible as an overdue risk rather than as a stale spreadsheet row.
[04] How We Engage
On Jira specifically
On Jira, we tighten project permissions, remove stale external accounts, and revoke over-scoped apps under agreed authority. Credentials found in tickets we treat as incidents and drive rotation. Permission scheme restructuring we project-manage, since it changes access for every project that shares the scheme.
Platform licence
Everything you need to find and fix it yourself, with no ceiling on the depth of the answer.
- Every connected tool monitored for misconfiguration and drift, with findings mapped to the assets and risks they affect
- Remediation guidance that tells you what is wrong and exactly how to fix it — however deep or awkward the issue is. We are engineers running a security company, so the answer is the real one, not a link to vendor documentation
- Assets, access reviews, and risk register populated from the tools themselves rather than from spreadsheets
- Unlimited integrations and unlimited users, with anything missing built within two weeks
Managed service
Every tool you connect through Konfirmity comes under our care, with our team doing the work.
- Continuous misconfiguration and drift monitoring across every connected tool, watched by our analysts rather than by a dashboard waiting for you
- Incident response led by us, with containment coordinated with your team
- Remediation performed directly wherever you have granted us the authority to act — and where we cannot act, we project-manage the fix to completion rather than handing you a ticket
- Decision support on the tools themselves: where something is failing you on capability or costing more than it returns, we will tell you, and help you replace it
[05] Jira FAQs
What Jira access does Konfirmity need?
Konfirmity needs a read-only account or API token with browse permission across projects, plus admin read for permission schemes and app inventory. That covers project permissions, content scanning and marketplace app scope.
Can Jira tickets serve as remediation evidence?
Yes, and it is the most natural place for it. Konfirmity pushes findings in as tickets with owners and deadlines, then reads closure back as evidence, so remediation is tracked where your engineers already work rather than in a parallel system nobody updates.
Linear
Asana
ServiceNow
Zendesk
ClickUp